(PC) Owbridge v. Douglas et al, No. 2:2009cv02833 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/5/2010 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/out prejudice. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Owbridge v. Douglas et al Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL OWBRIDGE, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-09-2833 FCD KJM P GLEN DOUGLAS, et al., Defendants. 14 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 15 By an order filed May 13, 2010, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return 16 17 to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. 18 That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s 19 order. 20 21 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States 23 District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 24 twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 25 written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings 26 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 2 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 DATED: August 5, 2010. 4 5 6 1 owbr2833.fusm 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
