(PS) Khudoy et al v. Washington Mutual Bank FA et al, No. 2:2009cv02569 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/26/10 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 15 are ADOPTED IN FULL; this action is DISMISSED pursuant to FRCP 41(b); dfts' motion to dismiss 7 is DENIED AS MOOT; and the clerk is directed to close this case.(Carlos, K)

Download PDF
(PS) Khudoy et al v. Washington Mutual Bank FA et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VLADIMIR KHUDOY; LYUDMILA KHUDOY, 11 Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-09-2569 MCE EFB PS 12 vs. 13 14 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FA; CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, and Does 1-250, 15 16 Defendants. __________________________________/ 17 ORDER On December 15, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 18 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 20 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. 21 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 22 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 23 1983). 24 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 25 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 26 \\\\\ 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed December 15, 2009, are 3 4 5 ADOPTED; 2. This action is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), based on plaintiffs’ failure to prosecute the action; 6 3. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Dckt. No. 7, is denied as moot; and 7 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 8 Dated: February 26, 2010 9 10 11 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.