(HC) Mireles v. Dickinson, No. 2:2009cv02554 - Document 19 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 03/07/11 ADOPTING in full 18 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; DENYING 11 Motion to Dismiss; Respondent is granted leave to file a renewed motion to dismiss on the grounds that petitioners petition does not affect the fact or duration of his custody; Respondent is directed to either file a renewed motion to dismiss, or otherwise properly respond to the petition, within 60 days of the date of this order.(Williams, D)

Download PDF
(HC) Mireles v. Dickinson Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OSUALDO MIRELES, 12 No. CIV S-09-2554-LKK-CMK-P Petitioner, 13 vs. 14 K. DICKINSON, 15 ORDER Respondents. 16 / 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On January 27, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have 23 been filed. 24 25 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 26 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 27, 2011, are adopted in 4 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 11) is denied; 5 3. Respondent is granted leave to file a renewed motion to dismiss on the 3 6 7 8 9 full; grounds that petitioner’s petition does not affect the fact or duration of his custody; and 4. Respondent is directed to either file a renewed motion to dismiss, or otherwise properly respond to the petition, within 60 days of the date of this order. DATED: March 7, 2011. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.