(PS) Henderson v. The Getty and Luk Oil Amerika, No. 2:2009cv02401 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 10/29/09 ADOPTING 4 Findings and Recommendations. This case is REMANDED to the Sacramento County Superior Court. The Clerk is directed to close the case. CASE CLOSED. (Engbretson, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Henderson v. The Getty and Luk Oil Amerika Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARGARET FULLERTON ROMANOV HENDERSON, 11 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2401 FCD EFB PS 12 vs. 13 14 15 THE GETTY AND LUK OIL AMERIKA, et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER 16 On September 10, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 17 18 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.1 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. 20 21 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 22 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 23 1983). 24 /// 25 1 26 On October 5, 2009, plaintiff did file some exhibits, which were considered by the court. Dckt. No. 5. 1 Dockets.Justia.com The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 1 2 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 3 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 4 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed September 10, 2009, are 5 6 7 8 9 ADOPTED; 2. This case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Sacramento; and, 3. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the case. DATED: October 29, 2009. 10 11 12 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
