(HC) Pittman v. Martel, No. 2:2009cv02314 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/11/09 ORDERING the clerk to randomly assign a US District Judge to this action; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/out prejudice. Assigned and Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due w/in 20 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Pittman v. Martel Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILBUR PITTMAN, 11 12 13 14 Petitioner, vs. M. MARTEL, ORDER AND Respondent. 15 16 No. CIV S-09-2314 DAD P FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / By order filed October 26, 2009, petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus 17 was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended petition was granted. The thirty day 18 period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise responded 19 to the court’s order. 20 21 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action; IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 25 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty 26 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 2 Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 3 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 4 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: December 11, 2009. 6 7 8 9 DAD:lg pitt2314.fta 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
