(HC) Pittman v. Martel, No. 2:2009cv02313 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/12/10 ORDERING the findings and recommendations filed 2/10/10, are adopted in full; and the amended petition is dismissed with prejudice, and this case is closed. CASE CLOSED(Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Pittman v. Martel Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILBUR PITTMAN, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 No. CIV S-09-2313 MCE GGH P vs. M. MARTEL, Warden, 14 Respondent. 15 ORDER / 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 17 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On February 10, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. 22 Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 10, 2010, are adopted in full; and 2. The amended petition is dismissed with prejudice, and this case is closed. Dated: April 12, 2010 5 6 7 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
