(PC) Jackson v. Swartz et al, No. 2:2009cv02254 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/6/10 ORDERING that the 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is VACATED; Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a District Judge to this case; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Jackson v. Swartz et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RACARDO JACKSON 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:09-cv-2254 KJN P vs. SOLANO COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER, et al., 14 Defendants. ORDER& FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 / 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with an action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 19, 2010, the undersigned issued an order for petitioner to Show 19 Cause why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to the Younger abstention doctrine. 20 Plaintiff has not filed a response. 21 Accordingly, the court recommends that this action be dismissed based on 22 plaintiff’s failure to respond to the February 19, 2010 order. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 41(b). 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. The August 14, 2009 (Dkt. No. 2) Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be 26 vacated. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a District Judge to this case. 2 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 4 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty- 5 one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 6 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 7 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 8 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 9 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 DATED: April 6, 2010 11 12 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 jack2254.dis 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
