(PC) Wilson v. Wever et al, No. 2:2009cv02191 - Document 91 (E.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/09/16 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply withy court rules and orders. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Wilson v. Wever et al Doc. 91 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN LEE WILSON, 12 No. 2:09-CV-2191-KJM-CMK-P Plaintiff, 13 vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SANDRA LEE WEVER, 15 Defendant. 16 / 17 18 Plaintiff, a former prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 A review of the docket reflects that defendant was served on January 15, 2016, 20 but has not filed a response to the complaint and that plaintiff has not taken any steps to 21 prosecute following defendant’s failure to file a response to the complaint. On October 13, 2016, 22 plaintiff was directed to show cause in writing within 30 days why the action should not be 23 dismissed for lack of prosecution. See Local Rule 110. To date, plaintiff has not responded to 24 the court’s order to show cause or otherwise prosecuted this action. 25 /// 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 The court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of 2 dismissal. See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. 3 U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors are: (1) the public's 4 interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court's need to manage its own docket; 5 (3) the risk of prejudice to opposing parties; (4) the public policy favoring disposition of cases on 6 their merits; and (5) the availability of less drastic sanctions. See id.; see also Ghazali v. Moran, 7 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam). A warning that the action may be dismissed as an 8 appropriate sanction is considered a less drastic alternative sufficient to satisfy the last factor. 9 See Malone, 833 F.2d at 132-33 & n.1. The sanction of dismissal for lack of prosecution is 10 appropriate where there has been unreasonable delay. See Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 11 1423 (9th Cir. 1986). 12 Upon consideration of these factors, the court finds that dismissal of the action is 13 an appropriate sanction. Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute thwarts both the public’s interest in 14 expeditious resolution of the case and the public policy favoring disposition on the merits. 15 Moreover, this court must manage its docket and terminate those actions where the plaintiff 16 demonstrates a lack of interest in prosecution. Finally, plaintiff has been warned throughout the 17 course of this litigation that lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court orders may 18 result in dismissal. 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 2 1 Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that this action be 2 dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and 3 orders. 4 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 5 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 14 days 6 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 7 objections with the court. Responses to objections shall be filed within 14 days after service of 8 objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal. 9 See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 11 DATED: December 9, 2016 12 13 ____________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.