(PC) Stevens v. Fuchs et al, No. 2:2009cv02111 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/21/10 recommending that this action be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Stevens v. Fuchs et al Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONALD L. STEVENS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-09-2111 WBS GGH P vs. MATT FUCHS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 A recent court order was served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by 17 the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which 18 requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for 20 plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f) and 21 110. 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 23 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 24 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 25 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 26 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 2 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 3 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: June 21, 2010 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 6 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 GGH:kly stev2111.33a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
