(PC) Chan v. County of Sacramento et al, No. 2:2009cv02006 - Document 55 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/14/10 ORDERING that the 49 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Pltf's claim regarding the Buddha alter contained in his 48 Motion is DENIED. (Owen, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Chan v. County of Sacramento et al Doc. 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MADY CHAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:09-cv-02006-MCE-GGH P vs. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking 18 relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 27, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 2 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 3 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 4 analysis. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 27, 2010, are adopted in full; and 7 2. Plaintiff’s claim regarding the Buddha altar contained in his August 17, 2010 motion 8 9 (Docket No. 48) is denied. Dated: September 15, 2010 10 11 12 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
