(PC) Lopez v. Hubbard, et al, No. 2:2009cv01928 - Document 48 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 05/12/10 recommending that defendant Rapoza be dismissed from this action. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Lopez v. Hubbard, et al Doc. 48 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH LOPEZ, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-09-1928 GEB GGH P vs. SUE HUBBARD, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 By order filed March 15, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within 17 fourteen days, why defendant Rapoza should not be dismissed from this action. The fourteen day 18 period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s 19 order. 20 21 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Rapoza be dismissed from this action. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 23 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 24 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 25 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 26 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the Dockets.Justia.com 1 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 2 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 DATED: May 12, 2010 4 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 lope1928.fr 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
