(SS) Oliver v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2009cv01925 - Document 22 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 09/02/10 ORDERING that this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative action. On remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administra tive Law Judge (ALJ) to: offer plf a new hearing and the opportunity to present new evidence. The ALJ will call a medical expert to help determine the onset date of disability and the date of medical improvement, if any. Taking into account the medical experts testimony and any additionally submitted evidence, the ALJ will issue a new decision. Clerk to enter final judgment. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
(SS) Oliver v. Commissioner of Social Security 1 8 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration JEFFREY CHEN Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8939 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Jeffrey.Chen@ssa.gov 9 Doc. 22 Attorneys for Defendant 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 12 NEANA M. OLIVER, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) 14 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) 15 Defendant. ) 16 ______________________________) Case No. 2:09-CV-01925-GGH 13 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), AND REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT 17 18 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 21 § 405(g), sentence four. 22 On remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to take 23 the following action: 24 The ALJ will be directed to offer Plaintiff a new hearing and the opportunity to present 25 new evidence. The ALJ will call a medical expert to help determine the onset date of disability 26 and the date of medical improvement, if any, consistent with Social Security Ruling 83-20. 27 Taking into account the medical expert’s testimony and any additionally submitted evidence, the 28 ALJ will issue a new decision. Stip. & Prop. Order for Remand 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final judgment 2 remanding this action to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative action. 3 4 Respectfully submitted, 5 Dated: August 26, 2010 s/ Rick Peasley [As authorized by telephone on August 26, 2010] RICK PEASLEY Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 8 Dated: August 26, 2010 9 10 11 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration By s/ Jeffrey Chen JEFFREY CHEN Special Assistant U. S. Attorney 12 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant 15 16 ORDER 17 18 19 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: 20 21 DATED: September 2, 2010 22 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows _________________________________ HON. GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 oliver.remand 25 26 27 28 Stip. & Prop. Order for Remand 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.