(PC) Isgrigg v. Heynie et al, No. 2:2009cv01905 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/19/10 ORDERING service is appropriate for defendants Heyne, Gomez and Jeffries. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff 3 USM-285 forms, 1 summons, instru ction sheet and a copy of the 09/10/09 amended complaint to be completed and returned within 28 days. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed against defendants Hatch, Walker, Rios, Dragosh and Hubbard. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF

(PC) Isgrigg v. Heynie et al Doc. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD L. ISGRIGG, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-09-1905 GEB GGH P R. HEYNIE, et al., 14 15 ORDER and Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 17 1983. This matter is referred to this undersigned by Local Rule 302 (c), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 18 § 636(b)(1); see also E.D. Cal. L. R. (“Local Rule”), Appx. A, at (k)(1)-(2). 19 Pursuant to orders filed August 10, 2009, this court granted plaintiff’s application 20 to proceed in forma pauperis, and found that plaintiff’s complaint, filed July 13, 2009, stated 21 colorable claims against defendants Heyne, Gomez and Jeffries, but not against defendants 22 Hatch, Walker, Rios, Dragosh and Hubbard. Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended 23 complaint to address the deficiencies noted by the court. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on 24 September 10, 2009. By order filed October 20, 2009, the court again found that plaintiff failed 25 to state claims against defendants Hatch, Walker, Rios, Dragosh and Hubbard, and granted 26 plaintiff twenty-eight days to further amend his complaint. That period has now expired, and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 plaintiff has not filed a further amended complaint. 2 The court will therefore direct plaintiff to complete the forms necessary for the 3 United States Marshal to serve process upon defendants Heyne, Gomez and Jeffries, and will 4 recommend the dismissal of the remaining defendants. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: Heyne, Gomez and Jeffries. 7 2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff 3 USM-285 forms, one summons, 8 an instruction sheet and a file-endorsed copy of plaintiff’s amended complaint filed September 9 10, 2009 (Docket No. 10). 10 3. Within twenty-eight days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the 11 attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court: 12 a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents; 13 b. One completed summons; 14 c. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant; and 15 d. Four copies of the endorsed complaint filed Sept. 10, 2009. 16 4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of 17 service. Upon timely receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United 18 States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil 19 Procedure, without payment of costs. 20 Further, for the reasons given in the undersigned’s order filed October 20, 2009, 21 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed against defendants Hatch, 22 Walker, Rios, Dragosh and Hubbard. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 25 twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 26 written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 2 1 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 2 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 3 DATED: January 19, 2010 4 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.