(PC) Navarro v. Herndon et al, No. 2:2009cv01878 - Document 210 (E.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/24/16 denying 205 Motion for sanctions. Plaintiff is granted 21 days from the date of this order to file supplemental objections to the 3/25/16 findings and recommendations. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIO NAVARRO, 12 13 14 15 No. 2: 09-cv-1878 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DEBRA HERNDON, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 19, 2016, the undersigned ordered defendants to file a status 19 report addressing the status of plaintiff’s legal property. (ECF No. 207.) On August 24, 2016, 20 defendants informed the court that, on about August 18, 2016, four boxes of plaintiff’s legal 21 property were shipped from California State Prison-Sacramento (“CSP-Sac”) to the California 22 Training Facility (“CTF”), where plaintiff is housed. (ECF No. 209.) 23 24 25 Because plaintiff’s legal property has been shipped to CTF, plaintiff is granted twenty-one days to file supplemental objections to the March 25, 2016 findings and recommendations. On August 15, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions against defendants. (ECF No. 26 205.) Plaintiff argues that defendants should be sanctioned because they are withholding his legal 27 property. Because plaintiff’s legal property has been shipped to CTF, plaintiff’s motion for 28 sanctions is denied. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 205) is denied; 3 2. Plaintiff is granted twenty-one days from the date of this order to file supplemental 4 objections to the March 25, 2016 findings and recommendations. 5 Dated: August 24, 2016 6 7 8 Na1878.san 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.