(PC) Lopez v. Schwarzenneger, et al., No. 2:2009cv01760 - Document 25 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/28/10 ADOPTING in full 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. This action proceeds on the amended complaint only as to those defendants named in the separately filed screening order. Defendants Schwarzenneger, Woodford, Adams, Lopez, Yamat, Anderson, Keener, Sheppard-Brooks and Rosenthal are dismissed. Defendant Cate is dismissed in his individual capacity. (Williams, D)
Download PDF
(PC) Lopez v. Schwarzenneger, et al. Doc. 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDREW RICK LOPEZ, 12 No. 2:09-cv-01760-MCE-GGH-P Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 4, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 2 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 3 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 4 analysis. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 4, 2010, are adopted in full; and 7 2. This action proceeds on the amended complaint only as to those defendants named in 8 the separately filed screening order and defendants Schwarzenegger, Woodford, Adams, Lopez, 9 Yamat, Anderson, Keener, Brooks, Rosenthal are dismissed from this action, and defendant Cate 10 11 is dismissed in his individual capacity. Dated: October 28, 2010 12 13 14 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2