(PC) Clark v. California State Prison Solano Medical Care System et al, No. 2:2009cv01638 - Document 46 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 8/11/10 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 44 are ADOPTED IN FULL; pltf's 12/14/09 motion for summary judgment 27 is DENIED. (Carlos, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Clark v. California State Prison Solano Medical Care System et al Doc. 46 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEROME DONALD CLARK, Plaintiff, ORDER vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-09-1638 WBS GGH P Defendants. 11 TRAN, et al., 14 / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 29, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 29, 2010, are adopted in full; 2 2. Plaintiff’s December 14, 2009, motion for summary judgment (docket #27), is 3 denied. 4 DATED: August 11, 2010 5 6 7 8 9 10 clar1638.801 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
