(PC) Clark v. California State Prison Solano Medical Care System et al, No. 2:2009cv01638 - Document 22 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 10/28/2009 ADOPTING 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; the claims against defendants Reyes, Freedhand and California State Prison Solano Medical Care System contained in the complaint are DISMISSED for the reasons stated in the 6/26/2009 7 order. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Clark v. California State Prison Solano Medical Care System et al Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEROME DONALD CLARK, Plaintiff, 11 12 No. CIV S-09-1638 WBS GGH P vs. 13 14 15 CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON SOLANO MEDICAL CARE SYSTEM, et al., Defendants. / 16 17 ORDER Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 20 On August 20, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 22 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 20, 2009, are adopted in full; and 3 2. The claims against defendants Reyes, Freedhand and California State Prison 4 Solano Medical Care System contained in the complaint are dismissed for the reasons stated in 5 the June 26, 2009, order. 6 DATED: October 28, 2009 7 8 9 10 11 12 clar1638.800 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.