(PC)Ramirez v. Unknown, No. 2:2009cv00994 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/08/09 ORDERING the clerk of the court is directed to randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England Jr. randomly assigned to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC)Ramirez v. Unknown Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN RAZO RAMIREZ, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. UNKNOWN, ORDER AND Defendant. 15 16 No. CIV S-09-0994 DAD P FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / By an order filed July 6, 2009, plaintiff was ordered to file, within thirty days, a 17 complaint that complies with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil 18 Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice together with an application requesting leave to 19 proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to 20 do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. On August 25, 2009, 21 plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days to comply with the court’s order. The time period 22 has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order, has not filed a complaint 23 and has not filed an application requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the 24 appropriate filing fee. 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action; 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 4 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty 5 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 6 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 7 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 8 shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised 9 that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 10 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 11 DATED: October 8, 2009. 12 13 14 15 DAD:lg rami0994.fifp 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
