(PC) David v. Solano County Jail et al, No. 2:2009cv00918 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/11/10 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 17 are ADOPTED IN FULL; and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
(PC) David v. Solano County Jail et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN L. DAVID, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:09cv0918 GEB KJN P vs. SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On July 9, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has not filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 9, 2010, are adopted in full; and 2 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 Dated: August 11, 2010 4 5 6 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.