(PS) Jandy v. Second District Court of the State of Nevada, et al, No. 2:2009cv00909 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/12/2009 ADOPTING 6 Findings and Recommendations in full; this action is dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Suttles, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Jandy v. Second District Court of the State of Nevada, et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANDY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 CIV-S-09-0909 LKK GGH PS vs. 13 14 SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN WASHOE COUNTY, et al., 15 16 Defendant. ORDER __________________________________/ 17 On September 1, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 18 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed. 20 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. 21 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 22 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 23 1983). 24 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 25 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. 26 \\\\\ 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed September 1, 2009, are ADOPTED; 3 4 5 and 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. DATED: November 12, 2009. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
