(PC) Bartholomew v. Sisto et al, No. 2:2009cv00882 - Document 23 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/17/10 ORDERING that the 4/27/10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 are ADOPTED in full; Defendants D.K. Sisto; E.V. Elisara and J.A. La are DISMISSED from this Action; and This Action will proceed as against the remaining defendants. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Bartholomew v. Sisto et al Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN BARTHOLOMEW, 12 No. CIV S-09-0882-JAM-CMK-P Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 D.K. SISTO, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On April 27, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have 23 been filed. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 27, 2010, are adopted in 4 2. Defendants Sisto, Elisara and La are dismissed form this action; and 5 3. This action will proceed as against the remaining defendants. 3 6 full; DATED: June 17, 2010 7 /s/ John A. Mendez 8 U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
