(PC) Rodella v. Jackson et al, No. 2:2009cv00794 - Document 63 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/22/11 ORDERING the findings and recommendations filed February 8, 2011, are adopted in full; Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment filed May 19, 2010 (Docket No. 26) is denied; Plaintiff's motions for default judgment filed July 6, 2010 (Docket No. 31) and July 9, 2010 (Docket No. 34) are denied; Plaintiff's motion for outside care filed July 9, 2010 (Docket No. 33) is denied; and Defendant Jackson's motion to dismiss filed July 6, 2010 (Docket No. 30) and joined by defendant Hibbits on November 8, 2010 (Docket No. 47) is denied.(Matson, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Rodella v. Jackson et al Doc. 63 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTOR JOSEPH RODELLA, 11 12 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-0794 GEB EFB P vs. 13 TERRY JACKSON, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On February 8, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. After an 22 extension of time, defendants have filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 25 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 26 proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 8, 2011, are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment filed May 19, 2010 (Docket No. 26) 4 is denied; 5 6 3. Plaintiff’s motions for default judgment filed July 6, 2010 (Docket No. 31) and July 9, 2010 (Docket No. 34) are denied; 7 8 9 4. Plaintiff’s motion for outside care filed July 9, 2010 (Docket No. 33) is denied; and 5. Defendant Jackson’s motion to dismiss filed July 6, 2010 (Docket No. 30) and 10 joined by defendant Hibbits on November 8, 2010 (Docket No. 47) is denied. 11 Dated: March 22, 2011 12 13 14 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
