(PS) Hughey et al v. Wells Fargo & Co. et al, No. 2:2009cv00723 - Document 43 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 24 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 07/07/09 and ORDERING that 22 plf's Motion for TRO is DENIED. (Benson, A.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Hughey et al v. Wells Fargo & Co. et al Doc. 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLIFFORD D. HUGHEY II, AND LAURA M. HUGHEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 2:09-cv-0723-GEB-EFB-PS vs. 14 WELLS FARGO & CO., et al., 15 Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER 16 17 On June 18, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 18 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed. 20 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. 21 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 22 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 23 1983). 24 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 25 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed June 18, 2009, are 3 4 5 ADOPTED; and 2. Plaintiffs’ motion for temporary restraining order is denied. Dated: July 7, 2009 6 7 8 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
