(HC) Randall v. Amador County Superior Court, No. 2:2009cv00677 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/1/09 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 5 are ADOPTED IN FULL; petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus 1 is DISMISSED. This action is CLOSED. (Carlos, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Randall v. Amador County Superior Court Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT BERT RANDALL, 11 12 13 Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-0677 LKK DAD P vs. AMADOR COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, 14 Respondent. 15 16 ORDER / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 17 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On March 31, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner 22 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72- 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 25 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 26 proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 31, 2009, are adopted in full; 3 2. Petitioner’s March 12, 2009 application for a writ of habeas corpus 4 5 6 (Doc. No. 1) is dismissed; and 3. This action is closed. DATED: September 1, 2009. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
