-KJN (PC) Walker v. CA Dept of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al, No. 2:2009cv00569 - Document 19 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 04/08/11 and ORDERING tha dfts CDCR, Woodford, Tilton, Grannis and Moreno are DISMISSED w/o prejudice. (Benson, A.)
Download PDF
-KJN (PC) Walker v. CA Dept of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 K. JAMEL WALKER, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 No. 2:09-cv-0569-WBS-KJN-P vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 14 Defendants. ORDER 15 / 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 23, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 22 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 23, 2011, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Defendants CDCR, Woodford, Tilton, Grannis, and Moreno, are dismissed 4 from this action without prejudice. 5 DATED: April 8, 2011 6 7 8 9 10 11 /walk0569.801 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2