(PC) Benyamini v. Liou et al, No. 2:2009cv00528 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/5/09 ADOPTING 15 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 14 Motion to Stay. Action is stayed until further order of the court and case administratively closed. (Owen, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Benyamini v. Liou et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT BENYAMINI, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:09-cv-0528-MCE-JFM (PC) vs. DR. ALEX LIOU, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On October 14, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 14, 2009, are adopted in full; 2 2. Plaintiff’s August 28, 2009 motion to stay this action is granted; 3 3. This action is stayed until further order of court; 4 4. The Clerk of the Court shall administratively close this case; and 5 5. Plaintiff is advised that this action will not proceed further unless and until he 6 7 files a request to lift the stay imposed by this order. Dated: November 5, 2009 8 9 10 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
