(PS) Moog v. Land O'Lakes et al, No. 2:2009cv00432 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 04/01/09 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/o prejudice; objections to these F&Rs due w/i 10 days; referred to Judge John A. Mendez. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
(PS) Moog v. Land O'Lakes et al Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSALITA YOUNG MOOG, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:09-cv-0432 JAM JFM PS vs. LAND O’LAKES, et al., 14 Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 15 By order filed February 26, 2009, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty 16 days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and 17 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. 18 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 19 prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 20 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 21 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days 22 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 23 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings 24 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 25 ///// 26 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 2 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 DATED: April 1, 2009. 4 5 6 7 /001; moog.fta 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.