(HC)Harper v. Felker et al, No. 2:2009cv00400 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 10/25/09 ORDERING the 6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED IN FULL; this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC)Harper v. Felker et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC HARPER, 11 Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-09-0400 WBS EFB P T. FELKER, et al., 14 Respondents. ORDER / 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 16 17 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On August 17, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner 22 has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 17, 2009 are adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. DATED: October 25, 2009 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
