(PC) Evans v. Sisto et al, No. 2:2009cv00292 - Document 57 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 51 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 5/5/10: Defendants' December 3, 2009 motion to dismiss is granted. Defendants shall answer the remaining claims in plaintiff's third amended complaint within ten days from the date of this order. Plaintiff's January 28, 2010 motion for temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction is denied. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Evans v. Sisto et al Doc. 57 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES EVANS, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 vs. FELKER, et al., Defendants. ORDER / 15 16 No. 2:09-cv-0292-WBS-JFM (PC) Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On March 30, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff 22 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 25 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 26 by proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 30, 2010, are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendants’ December 3, 2009 motion to dismiss is granted as to plaintiff’s 4 claim that his constitutional rights were violated by his transfer to High Desert State Prison and 5 as to his claim against defendants Felker and McDonald and denied in all other respects; 6 7 2. Defendants shall answer the remaining claims in plaintiff’s third amended complaint within ten days from the date of this order; and 8 9 10 3. Plaintiff’s January 28, 2010 motion for temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction is denied. DATED: May 5, 2010 11 12 13 14 15 16 /evan0292.805 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
