(PC) Evans v. McDonald et al, No. 2:2009cv00291 - Document 24 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 07/21/09; plf's 22 Motion for Injunctive Relief is DENIED; no further motions or requests for relief shall be entertained in this closed file. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
(PC) Evans v. McDonald et al Doc. 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES EVANS, Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 No. CIV S-09-0291-FCD-CMK-P ORDER M. McDONALD, et al., Defendants. 15 / 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On June 11, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have 23 been filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 11, 2009, are adopted in 4 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. 22) is denied; and 5 3. No further motions or requests for relief shall be entertained in this closed 3 full; 6 file. 7 DATED: July 21, 2009. 8 9 10 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.