(PC) Turner v. Sacramento County Jail, No. 2:2009cv00117 - Document 49 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 43 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 3/31/10: 25 , 28 Defendants' motions to dismiss are denied. Defendants are directed to answer the amended complaint within twenty days from the date of this order. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(PC) Turner v. Sacramento County Jail Doc. 49 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAFONZO R. TURNER, Plaintiff, 11 12 No. 2:09-cv-0117 WBS KJN (PC) vs. 13 SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al., 14 Defendants. / 15 16 ORDER Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On February 25, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. 22 Defendants have filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 25 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 26 by proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 25, 2010 are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendants’ motions to dismiss (## 25 and 28) are denied, and 4 3. Defendants are directed to answer the amended complaint within twenty days 5 from the date of this order. 6 DATED: March 31, 2010 7 8 9 10 11 12 hm/turn0117.806 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.