(PC) Hussein v. McDonald et al, No. 2:2008cv03097 - Document 22 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/18/12 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed September 13, 2011, are adopted in full; and With the exception of plaintiff's RLUIPA, First Amendment, and Equal Protection claims against defendant McDonald, all remaining claims are dismissed without leave to amend and without prejudice to filing in a new civil rights action. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
(PC) Hussein v. McDonald et al Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAKEEM ABDULLAH HUSSEIN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. CIV S-08-3097 GEB EFB P vs. 13 M.D. MCDONALD, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On September 13, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 13, 2011, are adopted in full; and 2. With the exception of plaintiff’s RLUIPA, First Amendment, and Equal 4 Protection claims against defendant McDonald, all remaining claims are dismissed without leave 5 to amend and without prejudice to filing in a new civil rights action. 6 Dated: January 18, 2012 7 8 9 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.