(PC) Sullivan v. Hubbard et al, No. 2:2008cv03085 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 11 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 04/04/09; this action is DISMISSED; Clerk to enter judgment and close case. CASE CLOSED(Benson, A.)

Download PDF
(PC) Sullivan v. Hubbard et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTONIO SULLIVAN, 12 13 14 2:08-cv-3085-GEB-CMK-P Plaintiff, vs. ORDER SUSAN HUBBARD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On February 17, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have 23 been filed.1 24 25 26 1 In his “objections,” plaintiff states only that he did not consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction and that he wants a District Judge to decide his case. He does not provide any substantive argument regarding the findings and recommendations. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 2 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 3 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 4 proper analysis. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 17, 2009, are adopted in 8 2. This action is dismissed; and 9 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment of dismissal and close 7 full; 10 this file. 11 Dated: April 4, 2009 12 13 14 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.