(PC) Taylor v. Barnes et al, No. 2:2008cv03013 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/28/09 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. randomly assigned. The new case number is 2:08-cv-3013 MCE DAD. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Taylor v. Barnes et al Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES TAYLOR, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-08-3013 DAD P vs. R. BARNES, et al., 14 ORDER AND Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 15 16 By an order filed December 19, 2008, plaintiff was ordered to file, within thirty 17 days, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis along with a 18 certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately 19 preceding the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in 20 a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and 21 plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed a completed affidavit in support 22 of his request to proceed in forma pauperis along with a certified copy his trust account 23 statement. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to 25 randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action; 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 4 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty 5 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 6 objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 7 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 8 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 9 Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 DATED: January 28, 2009. 11 12 13 14 DAD:lg tayl3013.fifp 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
