-TJB (HC) Milligan v. Ahlin, No. 2:2008cv02766 - Document 36 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 12/22/11 ORDERING that the Petitioner's second request 35 for an extension of time to fileobjections to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations is hereby GRANTED; and Petitioner shall have until January 11, 2012 to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-TJB (HC) Milligan v. Ahlin Doc. 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY L. MILLIGAN, 11 12 13 Petitioner, vs. PAM AHLIN, 14 15 16 2: 08 - cv - 2766 - MCE TJB ORDER Respondent. ________________________________/ Petitioner has requested a second and final thirty-day extension of time to file objections 17 to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations which was filed on October 21, 2011. 18 Petitioner previously requested and received an initial thirty-day extension of time to file 19 objections until December 12, 2011. Petitioner’s second request for a thirty-day extension of 20 time was executed beyond the December 12, 2011 deadline. Nevertheless, based upon the 21 representations made and only for this request, it is determined that good cause has been shown, 22 and the request is granted. Petitioner is advised, however, that no further extensions of time will 23 be granted, except for verified and extraordinary good cause shown. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. 26 Petitioner’s second request (Dkt. No. 35) for an extension of time to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations is hereby 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 GRANTED; and 2. Petitioner shall have until January 11, 2012 to file objections to the findings and recommendations. DATED: December 22, 2011 5 6 7 8 TIMOTHY J BOMMER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
