(PC) Wooten v. Brown et al, No. 2:2008cv02745 - Document 19 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/26/09 ORDERING that clerk of court is directed to randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this action. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to file an amended complaint. Objections due within 20 days. (Owen, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Wooten v. Brown et al Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO WOOTEN, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-2745 DAD P vs. MICHELLE TUPPER BROWN, et al., ORDER AND 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 15 16 / By order filed March 6, 2009, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and he was 17 granted 30 days in which to file an amended complaint was granted. On March 18, 2009, 18 plaintiff was granted an additional 120 days to file his amended complaint. On June 3, 2009, 19 plaintiff was granted one final extension of 120 days to file an amended complaint and was 20 admonished that no further extensions of time would be granted for this purpose. The entire 21 period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded 22 to the court’s order. 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action; IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 2 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 20 days 3 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 4 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 5 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 6 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 7 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 8 DATED: October 26, 2009. 9 10 11 DAD:lg woot2745.fta 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
