(SS) Craig vs Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2008cv02676 - Document 31 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 5/21/2010 ORDERING the findings and recommendations filed March 29, 2010, are adopted in full; Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (docket no. 22) is granted; and this action is dismissed. Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED. (Matson, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(SS) Craig vs Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND CRAIG, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-08-2676 WBS KJM MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. This Social Security action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 16 17 ORDER / 15 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, et seq., and Local Rule 72-302. 18 On March 29, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 20 findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Neither party has filed 21 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 22 23 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 24 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 29, 2010, are adopted in full; 25 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (docket no. 22) is granted; and 3 4 3. This action is dismissed. DATED: May 21, 2010 5 6 7 8 9 10 craig2676.jo 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
