(PS) Ruiz v. US Department of Education Federal Student Aid Conditional Disability Discharge, et al, No. 2:2008cv02579 - Document 19 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/23/09 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. REFERRED to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; objections due within 10 days after being served with these F&R's. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
(PS) Ruiz v. US Department of Education Federal Student Aid Conditional Disability Discharge, et al Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNIFER RUIZ, 11 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:08-cv-2579 LKK JFM PS vs. 13 14 15 16 17 18 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FEDERAL STUDENT AID CONDITIONAL DISABILITY DISCHARGE; PROGRESSIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / By order filed October 27, 2009, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within 19 twenty days, why his action should not be dismissed. The twenty day period has now expired, 20 and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order. 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days 25 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 26 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 2 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 3 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: November 23, 2009. 5 6 7 8 /001; ruiz.fsc 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.