-JFM (PC) Solomon v. Felker et al, No. 2:2008cv02544 - Document 80 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/3/11 ADOPTING in full 72 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's 65 motion for emergency transfer is DENIED; plaintiff's 66 motion for emergency injunction is DENIED; plaintiff's 67 motion for emergency injunction is DENIED, and plaintiff's 69 motion for emergency injunction is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-JFM (PC) Solomon v. Felker et al Doc. 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VINCENT J. SOLOMON, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 vs. LIEUTENANT SCHIRMER, et al., Defendants. ORDER / 15 16 No. 2:08-cv-2544 WBS JFM (PC) Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On August 15, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. By order 22 filed September 9, 2011, plaintiff received a thirty day extension of time to file objections. 23 Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 15, 2011, are adopted in full; 2 2. Plaintiff’s March 10, 2011 motion for emergency transfer is denied. 3 3. Plaintiff’s April 25, 2011 motion for emergency injunction is denied. 4 4. Plaintiff’s May 10, 2011 motion for emergency injunction is denied. 5 5. Plaintiff’s June 24, 2011 motion for emergency injunction is denied. 6 DATED: November 3, 2011 7 8 9 10 11 12 /solo2544.801 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
