(PC) Sandoval v. High Desert State Prison Healthcare Department and Medical Staff, No. 2:2008cv02541 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 04/14/09 ORDERING the clerk of the court shall assign a district judge to this case. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez randomly assigned. The clerk of the cou rt is directed to serve an informational copy of this order on Monica Anderson, Attorney General's Office of the State of California, P.O. Box 944255, 1300 I Street, Ste 125, Sacramento, CA, 94244-2550. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 90 days. (Plummer, M) Modified on 7/27/2009 (Engbretson, K.).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Sandoval v. High Desert State Prison Healthcare Department and Medical Staff Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANUEL SANDOVAL, Plaintiff, 11 No. CIV S-08-2541 KJM P vs. 12 14 HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON HEALTHCARE DEPARTMENT AND MEDICAL STAFF, 15 Defendant. 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 17 18 ORDER AND The court has been informed that plaintiff is deceased. No defendant has yet been served. 19 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 20 1. The Clerk of the Court shall assign a district judge to this case; and 21 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve an informational copy of this order 22 on Monica Anderson, Attorney General’s Office of the State of California, P.O. Box 944255, 23 1300 I Street, Suite 125, Sacramento, California 94244-2550. 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. 25 These findings and recommendations will be submitted to a United States District 26 Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ninety days after being served 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. 2 Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 3 Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 4 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: April 14, 2009. 6 7 8 1 sand2541.dec 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
