-KJN (PC) Graham v. Jaffe et al, No. 2:2008cv02533 - Document 42 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/31/2011 ORDERING that the 31 findings and recommendations filed October 22, 2010, are adopted in full. Defendants Dr. N. Jaffee, M. Vasquez, Captain Baughman, Sgt. Steffins, and Correctional Officers Nieves, Wooden and Silva are DISMISSED. Plaintiff's 1983 claims alleging threats against defendants Ellin and Dr. Acosta do not state cognizable civil rights claims and are DISMISSED. (Duong, D)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-KJN (PC) Graham v. Jaffe et al Doc. 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY GRAHAM, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. DR. M. JAFFE, et al., Defendants. 15 16 No. 2:08-cv-2533 GEB KJN P ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On October 22, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. 22 Despite granting plaintiff repeated extensions of time and directing reservice of the findings and 23 recommendations, neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 22, 2010, are adopted in full; 2 2. Defendants Dr. N. Jaffee, M. Vasquez, Captain Baughman, Sgt. Steffins, and 3 4 5 6 Correctional Officers Nieves, Wooden and Silva are dismissed; and 3. Plaintiff’s § 1983 claims alleging threats against defendants Ellin and Dr. Acosta do not state cognizable civil rights claims and are dismissed. Dated: March 31, 2011 7 8 9 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
