(PC) Smith v. Stovall et al, No. 2:2008cv02492 - Document 40 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/23/10 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 39 are ADOPTED IN FULL; dfts' motion to dismiss 26 is GRANTED IN PART; claims against dfts Oshner, Hawkness, Aurich, Albonico, Weeks, Scouce and Auigriu DISMISSED; within 10 days from this order, dfts Stovall and Lawrence shall answer the claims against them.(Carlos, K)

Download PDF
(PC) Smith v. Stovall et al Doc. 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHEAL SMITH, 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. 2:08-cv-2492-LKK-JFM (PC) vs. 13 SGT. R. STOVALL, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On January 26, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 26, 2010, are adopted in full; 2 2. Defendants’ August 20, 2009 motion to dismiss is granted in part; 3 3. The claims against defendants Oshner, Hawkness. Aurich, Albonico, Weeks, 4 Scouce and Auigriu are dismissed and said defendants are dismissed from this action; and 5 4. Within ten days from the date of this order defendants Stovall and Lawrence 6 shall answer theclaims against them arising from the allegedly inappropriate search and alleged 7 racial bias in searches and seating in the prison dining hall. 8 DATED: February 23, 2010. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.