(HC) Morris v. Clay, No. 2:2008cv01790 - Document 23 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 08/28/09 ADOPTING 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; and GRANTING 16 Motion to Stay. IT IS ORDERED that this action is STAYED and the Clerk is directed to administratively close the case; Petitioner sha ll file and serve a status report in this case on the first court day of each month; and Petitioner shall file and serve a motion to lift the stay in this action within 30 days after petitioner is served with the California Supreme Court's order disposing of the state exhaustion petition.(Streeter, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Morris v. Clay Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDONO LEON MORRIS, Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-08-1790 FCD DAD P I.D. CLAY, Warden, Respondent. 14 ORDER / 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 16 17 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On July 16, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 16, 2009, are adopted in full; 2 2. Petitioner’s October 9, 2008 renewed motion for a stay and abeyance (Doc. 3 No. 16) is granted; 3. This action is stayed and the Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively 4 5 6 7 close the case; 4. Petitioner shall file and serve a status report in this case on the first court day of each month; and 8 5. Petitioner shall file and serve a motion to lift the stay of this action, along with 9 a proposed amended petition containing only exhausted claims, within thirty days after petitioner 10 is served with the California Supreme Court’s order disposing of the state exhaustion petition. 11 DATED: August 28, 2009. 12 13 14 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
