(HC) Martinez v. Sisto, et al, No. 2:2008cv01786 - Document 28 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/13/09 ORDERING that The FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 7/28/09 25 are ADOPTED in full; Respondents' 10/10/08 MOTION to Dismiss 9 is DENIED. Respondents shall answer the petition within thirty days from the date of this order. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date respondents' answer is filed.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(HC) Martinez v. Sisto, et al Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY MARTINEZ, 12 Petitioner, 13 vs. 14 2;08-cv-1786-GEB-JFM (HC) D.K. SISTO, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 ORDER / 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 20 On July 28, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Respondents have filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 25 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 2 proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 28, 2009, are adopted in full; 5 2. Respondents’ October 10, 2008 motion to dismiss is denied; 6 3. Respondents shall answer the petition within thirty days from the date of this 7 order and shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the 8 determination of the issues presented in the application that are not already part of the record; and 9 3. Petitioner’s traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date 10 respondents’ answer is filed. 11 Dated: August 13, 2009 12 13 14 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.