-DAD (PC) Mitchell v. Snowden, et al, No. 2:2008cv01658 - Document 52 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/2/11 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed March 7, 2011, are adopted in full. Defendant Compton's 20 June 1, 2010 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED. (Duong, D)
Download PDF
-DAD (PC) Mitchell v. Snowden, et al Doc. 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL J. MITCHELL, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-08-1658 JAM DAD P SNOWDEN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On March 7, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 7, 2011, are adopted in full; 2 2. Defendant Compton’s June 1, 2010 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 20) is denied. 3 DATED: May 2, 2011 4 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2