(PS) O'Campo v. Ghoman et al, No. 2:2008cv01624 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 11/10/2009 ADOPTING 11 Findings and Recommendations in full; dfts' 5 Answer is stricken to the extent of being filed on behalf of dft Ghomans Properties, LLC and is deemed to be solely the answer of dft Raghbir Singh Ghoman dba Quik Shop 2; Clerk shall modify 5 docket to reflect this order. (Suttles, J)

Download PDF
(PS) O'Campo v. Ghoman et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIMAS O’CAMPO, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 No. CIV S-08-1624 FCD DAD PS vs. RAGHBIR SINGH GHOMAN dba QUIK SHOP 2; GHOMAN’S PROPERTIES, LLC., ORDER Defendants. 15 / 16 17 On July 29, 2009, the court granted defense counsel’s motion to withdraw as 18 attorney of record for defendants. Defendant Raghbir Singh Ghoman was substituted in propria 19 persona. Defendant Ghoman’s Properties, LLC was advised that a corporation may only appear 20 through counsel and that failure to obtain new counsel may result in a default being entered 21 against it. The case was referred to the assigned magistrate judge pursuant to Local Rule 72- 22 302(c)(21). 23 On October 6, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 24 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 25 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. No party 26 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 1 Dockets.Justia.com The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 1 2 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Although more than three 3 months have passed since defendant Ghoman’s Properties, LLC was advised that a corporation 4 may not appear in propria persona, no appearance has been made by an attorney representing this 5 defendant. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 6, 2009 (Doc. No. 11) are 8 9 adopted in full; 2. Defendants’ answer filed October 10, 2008 is stricken to the extent that it was 10 filed on behalf of defendant Ghoman’s Properties, LLC, and the answer is deemed to be solely 11 the answer of defendant Raghbir Singh Ghoman dba Quik Shop 2; and 12 3. The Clerk of the Court shall modify the docket to reflect that the answer filed 13 October 10, 2008 (Doc. No. 5) is the answer solely of defendant Raghbir Singh Ghoman. 14 DATED: November 10, 2009. 15 16 17 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.