(HC) Arnold v. Walker et al, No. 2:2008cv01541 - Document 22 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 2/6/09 ADOPTING 20 Findings and Recommendations in full. Ptnr's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Engbretson, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Arnold v. Walker et al Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES ARNOLD, Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 14 No. CIV S-08-1541-FCD-CMK-P ORDER JAMES WALKER, Respondent. 15 / 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On December 31, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have 23 been filed. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72- 1 2 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 3 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 4 by proper analysis. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 31, 2008, are adopted 8 2. Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is denied; and 9 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 7 10 in full; DATED: February 6, 2009. 11 12 13 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
