(PC) Savage v. Hubbard, et al, No. 2:2008cv01346 - Document 111 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 99 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/22/10: Plaintiff's March 15, 2010 motion is denied. Plaintiff's July 12, 2010 request to vacate the referral of this matter to a United States Magistrate Judge is denied. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
(PC) Savage v. Hubbard, et al Doc. 111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOB SAVAGE, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. SUZAN HUBBARD, et al., Defendants. 15 16 No. 2:08-cv-1346 LKK JFM (PC) ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On August 6, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff 22 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 25 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 26 proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In his July 12, 2010 response to an order to show cause issued by the magistrate 2 judge, plaintiff requests that the referral of this action to a United States Magistrate Judge be 3 vacated and that all further proceedings in this action be conducted before the undersigned. 4 Plaintiff has not shown any grounds which warrant such an order. Plaintiff’s request will 5 therefore be denied. 6 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 6, 2010, are adopted in full; 8 2. Plaintiff’s March 15, 2010 motion is denied; and 9 3. Plaintiff’s July 12, 2010 request to vacate the referral of this matter to a United 10 States Magistrate Judge is denied. 11 DATED: November 22, 2010. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2