(PS) Dillard et al v. Victoria M. Morton Enterprises, Inc. et al, No. 2:2008cv01339 - Document 55 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 6/28/10 ORDERING that the Findings and Recommendations 47 , are ADOPTED; the motion for voluntary dismissal is granted and defendant Victoria Morton, an individual, is dismissed without prejudice. (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Dillard et al v. Victoria M. Morton Enterprises, Inc. et al Doc. 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARILYN DILLARD, et al., 11 12 13 Plaintiffs, No. 2:08-cv-01339 FCD KJN PS v. ORDER VICTORIA M. MORTON ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 RUTH GALTIERI-CARLSON, et al., 17 Plaintiffs, No. 2:08-cv-01777 FCD KJN PS 18 v. 19 20 21 22 23 VICTORIA M. MORTON ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ On March 19, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations in Dillard 24 v. Victoria M. Morton Enters., et al., No. 2:08-cv-01339 FCD KJN PS, which were served on the 25 parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations 26 were to be filed within fourteen days. (Dkt. No. 47.) No objections were filed. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 1 2 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 3 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 4 1983). 5 6 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 7 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 8 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed March 19, 2010, are ADOPTED; 9 2. The motion for voluntary dismissal is granted and defendant Victoria Morton, an 10 individual, is dismissed without prejudice from Dillard v. Victoria M. Morton Enters., et al., No. 11 2:08-cv-01339 FCD KJN PS. 12 DATED: June 28, 2010. 13 14 15 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
