(PS) Price v. Dillion et al, No. 2:2008cv01153 - Document 56 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/3/09 ORDERING the findings and recommendations filed 4/15/09, are ADOPTED IN FULL; plaintiffs second amended complaint 31 is DISMISSED without leave to amend; defendants motion to dismiss 33 is GRANTED; All other pending motions and/or requests are denied as moot; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment of dismissal and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
(PS) Price v. Dillion et al Doc. 56 1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 WILLIAM HENRY PRICE, 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 No. CIV S-08-1153-LKK-CMK-P vs. ORDER DAVID B. DILLION, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 / 14 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil 15 rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern 16 District of California local rules. 17 On April 15, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 18 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 19 objections within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have 20 been filed. 21 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72- 22 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 23 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 24 proper analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 15, 2009, are adopted in 2. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (Doc. 31) is dismissed, without 3 full; 4 5 leave to amend, for failure to state a cognizable claim; 6 3. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 33) is granted; 7 4. All other pending motions and/or requests are denied as moot; and 8 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment of dismissal and close 9 10 this file. DATED: September 3, 2009. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.